Agent or Attorney- Who Gets You More Money?

Image via ehow.com

So you have some debtors who refuse to pay up, huh? You’ve tried everything in your power to get them to take responsibility for their debts, but they are either unresponsive or they simply refuse to pay you a single cent of the loan they owe you. It’s become clear that if you want to restore cash flow from this debtor’s account, you will need to take decisive action and hire a collection professional to settle the matter for you.

But who should you hire- a collection agent, or an attorney?

For most people, the choice between an agent and an attorney revolves around which professional will get them more money from their debtors. And in just about every case, hiring an attorney is the more profitable choice to make.

Debtors love to ignore collection agents. Debtors understand that collection agents don’t actually have any power in and of themselves. Agents are just normal employees who work for collection companies and have no leverage over their debtors. Even more importantly, a collection agent can’t personally take a debtor to court or levy serious action against them. Instead, a collection agent can only harass a debtor with phone calls and letters.

These days debtors are experts at dodging or otherwise ignoring these annoying attempts at communication, rendering collection agents effectively powerless. If a collection agent wants to take any sort of serious action against a debtor, they will need to contact an attorney.

Only an attorney can provide a debtor with the real pressure they need to begin repayment. If your collection agency needs to hire an attorney to enforce their actions, then why not skip the middle-man and simply hire an attorney from the start? Not only will you save money, but communication from an attorney bears the weight you need to actually see positive action from your debtors.