Showing posts with label collection practices. Show all posts
Showing posts with label collection practices. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

The Importance of Varied Collection Tactics


Image via poststar.com


It isn’t enough to simply hire a collection agency that doesn’t use underhanded tactics to attempt to pressure debtors into paying- you need to hire a firm that utilizes a variety of different tactics to increase the chances of acquiring the money owed to you. Tactical variety is important for a number of different reasons.

First, it can be more difficult for a debtor to lodge a legal complaint against a collection agency that uses a variety of low-pressure tactics than a collection agency that hammers them repeatedly with the same tactic. For example, a collection agency that calls their debtors multiple times a day is a much clearer candidate than a collection agency that occasionally calls, occasionally sends a letter, and occasionally makes a personal appearance.

If an agent repeatedly calls a debtor and that debtor never picks up the phone or calls the agent back, it’s clear the phone doesn’t offer a viable form of communication. As such, any agent who persists in calling proves they are simply attempting to pressure their debtors and isn’t attempting to discover a legitimate communication channel with them.

On the other hand, an agent who uses multiple communication channels is more clearly searching for a way to speak with their debtor about their outstanding account. As long as an agent uses a varied set of collection tactics within the bounds of the law, they inhabit a far more legally defensible position.

Varied collection tactics are also more effective than a single tactic, used repeatedly, because varied tactics are more difficult to defend against. A debtor who solely receives repeated phone calls from a collection agent needs to do nothing more than ignore those calls to wall themselves off from taking responsibility for their debts. An agent who uses multiple tactics has a considerably greater chance of getting through their debtor’s defenses and actually making contact. 

Thursday, February 9, 2012

Taking Responsibility as a Collection Agency


Collection agencies don’t always have the best reputations, and often with good reason. Many collection agencies utilize a whole suite of underhanded and downright immoral tactics in their quest to receive payment on their accounts. While tenacity is certainly a good thing in the world of debt collection, there’s no need to resort to unsavory tactics in order to close a case. Any collection agency that resorts to harassing, bullying, and applying negative pressure to their debtors is simply proving their lack of expertise in this admittedly challenging field.

Most lenders would prefer to collect from their debtors without their collection representative resorting to these sorts of tactics for a couple reasons. The first of these reasons is moral in nature- most lenders don’t want to be associated with a collection agency that uses tactics they consider underhanded, manipulative or actively insulting.

Yet there is a very good reason why a collection firm shouldn’t resort to acting in such a negative manner- thug tactics rarely work. The more a collection agency attempts to “squeeze” or threaten their debtors, the more that debtor will take increasingly drastic measures to avoid their financial responsibilities. A hefty loan is distressing enough on its own for debtors. Once you add on the constant threats and acts of harassment utilized by some debt collectors you create a negative situation of truly overwhelming proportions.

Considering the fact bullying collection tactics are both distasteful and ineffective, it’s surprising so many collection agencies continue to utilize them. The reason why most agencies stubbornly persist with these tactics is simple- they don’t know any other method to try out. Most collection agencies simply don’t have the training, the experience, or the imagination necessary to figure out a more effective, and less distressing, mode of closing their cases. 

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

3 Sure Fire Ways to Collect International Debt

Image via Machinesupport.com

Over the last 3 years, more people than ever before have started to default on their debts or otherwise attempted to skip out on their financial obligations. While plenty of individuals have begun to default on their domestic debt, even more people have defaulted on their international debt. International debt is more difficult to collect due to the fact every nation has their own laws regarding its collection, and a collection agent needs to abide by these laws. That's to say nothing about the added difficulty of tracking down an international debtor.

Despite these difficulties, there are 3 sure-fire ways you can collect international debt.

1. Know the Laws Involved: Not every country have the same legal agreements between each other regarding how you can collect on international debt. For example the United States has a different set of debt collection agreements with many Asian countries than they do with European countries. If you aren't well versed in these laws, or if you don't feel like you'll be able to understand them on your own, then consider working with a lawyer well versed in the relevant laws.

2. Sue the debtor: Filing official legal actions is your best bet when it comes to grabbing an international debtor's attention. International debtors are unlikely to respond to the same light, unofficial pressures as domestic debtors so taking serious, official, and occasionally drastic measures is often necessary. Keep in mind that the actual legal process and proceedings will occur within the court of the country of your debtor.

3. Pawn the debt off: You can also sell the right to collect the debts you're currently chasing to a company better versed in international collections. This is the fastest and easiest method of receiving compensation for the international debts you're presently responsible for.

Settling an international debt isn't impossible, but it is more difficult than collecting domestic debt.

Share this on: