Image courtesy of patpitchaya / freedigitalphotos.net |
The past year has been a whirlwind of speculation and heated
discussion in the debt collection industry and among collection attorneys, as
federal regulators zeroed in on ways to resolve the backlash of problems
created by the financial crisis of 2008.
Much of those solutions involve increased regulations in an already
heavily regulated industry, as topics like accurate originating documentation for
litigation and communication via digital methods became “hot button” issues
across the media.
With this in mind, here are three New Year’s resolutions
you need to make now if you’re in the collections industry in any capacity.
Resolution #1: Stay vigilant and informed
By February 16th, 2014, the Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau will stop taking advice from consumer advocates and
collection industry insiders. At that
point, they’ll determine the new rules based on the knowledge they received
during the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking period. This means that there will be new rules and
you will have to stay updated on them, so vigilance is more important this year
than it has been in a long time.
Resolution #2: Pay
close attention to your third-party vendors
Last year, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau made it
very clear that a collection agency could be held responsible for the
collection actions taken by any third-party vendor it hires.
Resolution #3:
Remember that communication is working, and will continue to work
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau stated that out of
the 5,329 debt collection complaints it added to its consumer complaints
database, 5071 consumers reported a timely response from the company. What this means is that despite the current
agitation between consumer advocacy groups and debt collection insiders,
opening lines of communication to improve the consumer experience works and
both sides want to see it happen. Also,
almost 20 percent of the total number of complaints added to the database fell
under the category of “communication tactics,” with the largest portion
complaining about too-frequent calls, or calls that occurred after a cease and
desist request was filed. Honest
discussion about digital communication, or methods of contact other than
calling, should be (and are being) brought to the forefront of the debate.
No comments:
Post a Comment