Image courtesy of AKZOphoto / www.flickr.com |
It is common knowledge that the housing market took a large
turn for the worse over the past few years.
More and more foreclosures have put homeowners out of their home and
placed banks scrambling to sell houses they thought were already sold.
Recently, the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals passed a
judgment that made foreclosures on mortgages an act of ‘debt collection.’ This
was done under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and it reversed a
decision made by the lower courts.
This decision basically states that third parties that are
working through the foreclosure process need to abide by the FDCPA laws and
regulations. The decision was made in
response to Glazer V. Chase Home Finance, LLC.
Glazer inherited a home only to discover there was still an active
mortgage that Chase held. Six payments
were missed and a law firm was contacted
to start the foreclosure proceedings.
The mortgage wasn’t owned by Chase, nor did it originate
there. Fannie Mae was the mortgage owner
and Chase was assigned to service the originator. This made the entire process more complicated
for Glazer to find details of the proceedings out and made it difficult to
settle the problem.
Glazer sought a lawsuit for FDCPA damages but an Ohio judge sided with
Chase and their lawyers instead and dismissed the case entirely. The panel stated Chase wasn’t a debt
collector; however the lawyers working to collect on the lien were considered
debt collectors and expected to follow the guidelines of FDCPA.
This means that there are a set of regulations and
guidelines mortgage collectors will be expected to follow. Likewise debtors will also be expected to
follow the laws and regulations. With
this kind of formalities imposed on the system there is expected to be smoother
transitions and hopefully less homeowners put out of their home.
No comments:
Post a Comment